The U.S. Navy’s Carrier Air Wings Lack Range

The fleet needs long-range drones and fighters, one study warned

The U.S. Navy’s Carrier Air Wings Lack Range The U.S. Navy’s Carrier Air Wings Lack Range

WIB air December 19, 2018

The U.S. Navy’s carrier air wings lack the range to win in battle with Chinese and Russian forces, according to one new study. The... The U.S. Navy’s Carrier Air Wings Lack Range

The U.S. Navy’s carrier air wings lack the range to win in battle with Chinese and Russian forces, according to one new study.

The Navy’s nine front-line wings “lack the range, endurance, survivability and specialization to carry out the operational concepts needed to defeat great-power militaries,” the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments warned in its December 2018 report “Regaining the High Ground at Sea.”

The Navy possesses 10 nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, but makes do with nine wings, as at least one carrier is always in deep maintenance. The Navy’s goal is for six carriers to be able to deploy within 30 days of a crisis, with another joining them within 90 days.

Each wing operates around 70 aircraft, including more than 40 F/A-18 fighters in four squadrons plus small numbers of E-2 early-warning planes, EA-18G radar-jamming planes, C-2 cargo planes and helicopters.

The Navy plans to begin adding F-35 stealth fighters to the air wings starting in 2019, with MQ-25 tanker drones and V-22 cargo tiltrotors to follow in the early 2020s.

During the Cold War, the typical combat aircraft in a U.S. Navy carrier air wing — say, an A-6 bomber or F-14 fighter — could range as far as 1,800 miles with a seven-ton payload.

But the wings changed as the world did, the CSBA report explained. “Following the Soviet Union’s dissolution in 1991, the Navy faced a situation it had not encoun­tered since the birth of naval aviation: the lack of a peer competitor.”

“The more permissive environments and less challenging missions of the post-Cold War period allowed the Navy to eliminate specialized airframes, including the F-14 Tomcat fighter and S-3B Viking [anti-submarine warfare] aircraft, in favor of multi-role F/A-18A-D Hornets and F/A-18E/F Super Hornets.”

“This evolu­tion will reach its apotheosis by the end of this decade with CVWs consisting entirely of F/A-18E/Fs and similar EA-18Gs supported by E-2D Hawkeye airborne early warning and control … aircraft and MH-60 ASW and multi-mission helicopters.”

By 2018 the range of a typical carrier combat plane with a nine-ton payload had shrunk to just 1,300 miles. Meanwhile, Russia and China were developing longer-range anti-ship missiles and other weapons capable of threatening a carrier and its planes.

“CVWs need to be able to operate at longer ranges and in more contested environments than they have since the end of the Cold War,” the CSBA study advised.

The think tank proposed adding a theoretical new long-range fighter it called the “FA-XX” plus unmanned combat air vehicles to the air wings before 2040. “The addition of long-range UCAVs and FA-XX fighters would increase the average range of combat aircraft in the CVW.”

As a bonus, the new drones could be smaller than an F/A-18 is, allowing a carrier to embark more aircraft during a crisis than a flattop can do today.

“Although the proposed 2040 CVW includes a few more aircraft than today’s CVW, it would only take up 60 F/A-18C-sized spots compared to the 70 spots in today’s CVW. The maximum number of spots available in a Nimitz-class CVN is about 98 to 104, enabling the future CVW to incorporate additional aircraft to address emergent mission requirements.”

“The proposed 2040 CVW will cost more than Navy’s planned CVW, but the Navy may have no choice but to incur these additional costs or decide to relegate carrier aviation to a niche capa­bility dedicated to permissive operations against less stressing threats,” the study stated. The Pentagon could free up some money for new aircraft by reducing the number of wings to eight, it advised.

If the Navy doesn’t enhance its carrier wings, it risks the wings — and, by extension, the carriers — losing relevance, the study warned. “If the Navy is unable to trans­form its CVWs, Navy leaders should reconsider whether to continue investing in carrier aviation or shift the fleet’s resources to more relevant capabilities.”

This story originally appeared at The National Interest.

If you have any problems viewing this article, please report it here.
  • 100% ad free experience
  • Get our best stories sent to your inbox every day
  • Membership to private Facebook group
Show your support for continued hard hitting content.
Only $19.99 per year!
Become a War is Boring subscriber