Hundreds of Civilians Killed During the Turkish Capture of Al Bab

WIB front February 25, 2017 0

Turkish-backed rebels in Al Bab. Screen capture via YouTube Victory over the Islamic State in this Syrian city brings with it a heavy toll by SAMUEL OAKFORD...
Turkish-backed rebels in Al Bab. Screen capture via YouTube

Victory over the Islamic State in this Syrian city brings with it a heavy toll


After more than three months of fighting, Turkish-backed Syrian rebels have captured central Al Bab from the so-called Islamic State, according to local reports.

Yet civilian deaths from air strikes, artillery and ground combat in and around the town reportedly reached into the hundreds, the United Nations claimed.

Considering Al Bab’s small size, this high toll raises concerns about further Turkish-led actions in northern Syria — where the United States has supported Kurdish forces that Turkey now says it will next target.

As the administration of U.S. president Donald Trump weighs whether to revamp American military policy in Syria, and possible lower thresholds for civilian casualties, the threat of prolonged and bloodier confrontations grows.

Following heavy criticism from NATO ally Turkey, since mid-January the U.S.-led coalition launched nearly 50 air strikes in support of Turkish forces fighting to capture Al Bab. The raids represented a distinct third front of coalition activity after operations at Raqqa and Mosul — and added a volatile element to an already convoluted situation in the town.

By entering the fray, the coalition also became the third international force bombing Al Bab, in addition to Turkey and Russia. On the ground, Turkish forces and allied opposition units battled the Islamic State.

Following news of I.S.’s withdrawal from Al Bab on Feb. 23, Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Ankara’s Euphrates Shield operation would now continue toward Kurdish-held Manbij. That city lies to the east of Al Bab and was captured in the summer of 2016 by Syrian Democratic Forces backed by deadly U.S.-led coalition air support.

The presence of the predominantly Kurdish SDF in Manbij has been a point of tension for Turkey ever since. A January assessment conducted by the Washington Institute predicted that Turkey may apply the same ruthless techniques used in Al Bab at Manbij, “leaving Washington with the prospect of major civilian carnage.”

North Syria grows increasingly chaotic

In late December, after the United States initially balked at supporting Turkey’s unilateral move on Al Bab — preferring attention be paid to Raqqa instead — Ankara began cooperating with Russia to coordinate strikes around Al Bab.

Whatever the level of cooperation, this was an unprecedented move for a NATO member, and increased pressure on the US to provide its own superior air power.

The Obama administration had tried to maintain a delicate balance — and forestall an extended confrontation — between its treaty ally Turkey and the Kurdish People’s Protection Units, or YPG, that fight under the SDF banner.

Turkey accuses the YPG of being the Syrian branch of the Kurdistan Worker’s Party, or PKK, a militant group waging a renewed campaign inside Turkey.

Civilians reported killed in Beza’a city east of Al Bab. At left — Abd al Jawwad Yassin. Top right — Mohammad, the son of Abd al Sattar and a child, the daughter of Abd al Sattar. Bottom right— Abd al Sattar Yassin. Photos courtesy of Al Bab al Hadath

Both Turkey and the United States consider the PKK to be a terrorist organization. The United States, however has embedded special operations forces with the SDF, and has relied on the group to capture northern Syrian cities including Manbij.

The coalition has also backed SDF with hundreds of air strikes in recent months around the Islamic State’s self-declared capital of Raqqa. In this climate, U.S. CENTCOM told told Airwars as late as Jan. 10 that there had been “no changes to existing U.S. policy regarding support to the Turkish military in Al Bab,” and that American forces were not “conducting U.S. air strikes in or near Al Bab.”

That stance changed just one week later, when the coalition said that it had carried out its first strikes in the area on Jan. 17 — just three days before U.S. president Barack Obama left office. Since then, the coalition launched at least 47 raids, according to daily strike reports.

Those bombings supported an existing mix of Turkish air and artillery strikes, as well as regular Russian raids and a collage of ground forces — making the tracking and attributing of civilian casualties difficult.

While it appears that Turkish air strikes were primarily focused on the western part of the city — where its forces made slow progress — coalition and Russian strikes were harder to pinpoint, and neither belligerent provides exact locations for where their weapons are released.

Airwars has monitored dozens of reported civilian casualty incidents in Al Bab since November 2016. Tellingly, reports often conflated Turkish and coalition actions well before the U.S.-led alliance was officially involved. Through January, the coalition insisted that Ankara’s offensive was unilateral.

On Dec. 9, to take one example, reports indicated that at least 13 civilians were killed in Al Bab. Local accounts cited both the coalition and Turkey, though most blamed Ankara. One local report described how Al Bab “came under aerial bombardment and heavy artillery… [by the] Turkish army,” leaving more than 20 dead from a single family.

Three days later, on Dec. 12, 12 civilians including six children were reported killed, and local accounts blamed both Turkey and the coalition.

Given Turkey’s official membership in the coalition, it is not always clear if local reports mean to distinguish between the two entities. Since the official start of coalition strikes in January, that task has become even harder. Extending Euphrates Shield will likely create further contested reporting.

Airwars asked the coalition how it split targets with Turkey. A spokesperson provided the following statement:

“The coalition uses a variety of intelligence, reconnaissance, and surveillance to provide accurate information to intelligence centers, strike cells, pilots, and commanders. These information sources provide the coalition with situational awareness and allow for research and target development on the enemy’s functional use of locations and structures.”

Fadel Abdul Ghany, director of the Syrian Network for Human Rights, says his organisation does attempt to separate Turkish and coalition attacks based on certain clues.

“We do distinguish between them, and we do not consider them as one side — as if Turkey was a member of the coalition,” Abdul Ghany told Airwars. “It is hard,” he added, “but the international coalition strikes are more precise and more powerful.”

The front lines around Al Bab, center, on Feb. 24, 2017. The Islamic State is in black, the Syrian government in red, and SDF forces in yellow. Territory controlled by Turkish-backed Syrian fighters is in green. Illustration via Syria LiveuaMap

More than 300 civilians slain

The U.N.’s human rights office — OHCHR — has also been tracking events in Al Bab, and provided Airwars with data from December 2016 through Feb. 17, 2017, just before the town fell.

Matthias Behnke, head of OHCHR’s Syria Team said the team “received reports that about 300 civilians have been killed so far as a result of the offensive to retake Al Bab, primarily due to air strikes but also from improvised explosive devises.”

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights put the toll slightly higher, reporting that 353 civilians, including 87 children and 55 women had been killed between Nov. 13, 2016 and Feb. 20, 2017. It blamed those deaths on Turkish air strikes and artillery.

Alarmingly, Behnke said that their monitoring suggested that “at least 100 civilians have been killed in and around Al Bab town since Feb. 1.” A strike on Feb. 8, he noted, “allegedly killed at least 27 civilians and injured at least 30 others, many of them from the same family.”

According to the daily coalition strike report for Feb. 8, “Near Al Bab, three strikes engaged two ISIL tactical units; destroyed two mortar systems, a VBIED, vehicle, and a tunnel entrance.”

However, local reports monitored by Airwars blamed Turkey. Al Bab 24, for instance, blamed “Turkish air and artillery shelling” and provided an extensive list of civilians from several families. “The number of victims under the rubble is large and it hasn’t been possible to pull them all out due to heavy shelling,” the report added.

On Feb. 13 — when the coalition reported no strikes — at least 15 civilians were allegedly killed in Al Bab. The Al Bab Coordination Committee provided the names of 17 people, including five women, which it said had perished.

Syrian outlet Shaam News cited I.S. news reports which referred to “Turkish aircraft and aircraft of the international coalition” — reflecting the confusion over who exactly is bombing Al Bab.

For locals caught up in the violence, there is often little difference.

Worsening the plight of civilians, according to the United Nations, are reports that militants have shot at residents of the city to prevent them from fleeing. “U.N. Human Rights Office received a number of reports of ISIL fighters shooting civilians trying to leave toward areas controlled by armed opposition groups,” Behnke said.

But the United Nations has also received reports that Turkish-backed rebels have “shot civilians who are mistaken for ISIL elements, and a few reports of government forces positioned south of Al Bab firing on civilians who are trying to leave toward Al Raqqa.”

Given the complicated politics of the Al Bab operation and its high civilian toll from Turkish attacks, it is also unclear the extent to which non-U.S. coalition members took part in bombings there.

The coalition would not provide a breakdown of what countries have bombed Al Bab, but the United Kingdom told Airwars it carried out one attack during 2017, on Jan. 18. The U.K. Ministry of Defense declined to comment on whether it planned to launch any further military actions in the vicinity of Al Bab.

While the coalition’s task is more straightforward in Iraq where it cooperates with the government, the complexities of Syria may make it more difficult for coalition members to see eye to eye.

The latest civilian casualty incident in Al Bab monitored by the United Nations took place on Feb. 20. Behnke said it initially appeared that “tens” of people had been killed. Airwars researchers tracked reports of civilian casualties on this day, when both the coalition and Turkey reported strikes.

The Turkish military stated it had bombed or shelled more than 250 targets in Al Bab between Feb. 19 and Feb. 21. The coalition meanwhile reported that “Near Al Bab, three strikes engaged two ISIS tactical units, destroyed four ISIS-held buildings, and damaged an ISIS-held building.”

A Turkish F-4 Phantom II. U.S. Air Force photo

Disproportionate toll

If 300 civilians or more were killed in Al Bab since December, it would represent a major toll proportionate to Raqqa and Mosul, where hundreds of thousands more civilians continue to reside, and where the coalition is now releasing thousands of bombs each month.

Al Bab is much smaller than both cities, and was defended by at most several hundred I.S. fighters — possibly fewer than the number of civilians killed. The coalition was but one actor in Al Bab — but it was unclear to what extent they are communication with the Turks with an eye to protecting civilians.

Reports in the days before Al Bab’s fall indicate the Trump administration may be willing to lessen support to the SDF, favoring long-term stability with Turkey. According to Aaron Stein, senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, that decision to appease the Turks could prolong the campaign to take Raqqa.

Indeed, Turkey has made clear it intends to move not toward Raqqa, but Manbij.

“The flash points, however, would be Al Bab, Manbij, and Tabqah,” Stein wrote in a recent assessment of U.S.-Turkish interests in northern Syria. “In this scenario, Washington would have to assume the risk of Kurdish-Turkish escalation in favor of the broader effort to appease Ankara while also ousting the Islamic State from Raqqa with a Turkish-backed force.”

Choosing Turkey over the better-poised SDF could stretch the fight for Raqqa into 2018 — ample time for hundreds more air strikes.

This article originally appeared at Airwars.

If you have any problems viewing this article, please report it here.
  • 100% ad free experience
  • Get our best stories sent to your inbox every day
  • Membership to private Facebook group
Show your support for continued hard hitting content.
Only $19.99 per year!
Become a War is Boring subscriber