The Real Reason Sweden Brought Back the Draft

March 11, 2017 War Is Boring 0

Swedish soldiers get muddy during a 2014 exercise in Germany. U.S. Army photo Young Swedes don’t want to join the military by ALBIN ARONSSON...
Swedish soldiers get muddy during a 2014 exercise in Germany. U.S. Army photo

Young Swedes don’t want to join the military

by ALBIN ARONSSON & BLAKE FRANKO

The Swedish government has had conscription lying dormant since 2010 and finally feels the need to once again press the nation’s youth into service. While this may be construed as part of Stockholm’s desire to show its commitment to Baltic security, the underlying reasons for the reintroduction of conscription may be more pragmatic politically.

Whether Sweden wants to admit it or not, its armed forces have a manpower shortage and conscription is an easy way to fill the ranks.

Originally introduced in 1901, conscription in the country was aimed at providing defense for the long-held desire to remain neutral, while defending Swedish borders. After the end of the Cold War and a switch to predominantly foreign missions, Stockholm started gearing its military towards an all-professional force.

Thus, as of 2010, conscription was stopped until deemed necessary once again. That time has now arrived, as evinced by a recent government led report.

The inquiry found that only 2,500 of the 4,000 needed training slots had been filled in 2015 and that recruitment would need to increase 47 percent starting in 2017 to fulfill the needed expectation of employed soldiers and officers.

For additional consideration, out of the nations on the Baltic Sea, Sweden spends the smallest share on defense in proportion to its GDP. While many in the United States, including U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis, are pushing for European NATO members to hit two percent of GDP defense spending, Stockholm is projected to spend a measly one percent of GDP on defense by 2020.

As a comparison, this has gone down from around two percent of GDP in 1997, and three percent of GDP in 1976.

A Swedish army soldier fires a Colt Canada C8 carbine during a 2016 competition in Denmark. U.S. Army photo

In addition to the generally low defense spending by Sweden, there are not many incentives to join the military — at least financially. Compared to the average Swedish salary, wages are quite low in the military with starting pay around 18,000 kronor a month, or approximately $2,000.

Since the force was geared toward becoming an all-professional military, there are bonuses for added-risk salary for international missions, in addition to 24-hour training missions, but they are from an international perspective low in comparison to other countries.

Reintroducing conscription is also an effective way to superficially fill the ranks of Sweden’s armed forces. The Supreme Commander of the Swedish Armed Forces recently announced that at least an additional 6.5 billion kronor [$720 million] would be needed to fulfill the minimum requirements set for the armed forces from the defense bill from 2015, for the budget from 2016–20. The total annual budget is around $5.8 billion.

The combination of government reluctant to spend more on the military, in addition to the weakening of the kronor and strengthening of the dollar, have made the prospects for defense far more expensive. The acquisition of big-ticket items like 60 new JAS Gripen E [$4 billion] and two new A26 submarines [$900 million] will also further strain budgets.

Returning to the geopolitical realm, Sweden has also been hard pressed to take a larger stand against perceived Russian aggression, particularly within the Baltic Sea. Last year’s buzzing of American ships by Russian jets show that Moscow means business and will try to intimidate a superpower like the United States, much less a smaller regional power like Sweden.

In order to better secure its own territory, Stockholm has not been entirely silent. A major step was taken last summer when the Supreme Commander of the Swedish Armed Forces unexpectedly decided to permanently station soldiers on Gotland Island once again.

If any regional conflict were to occur, the island’s strategic location in between Latvia and Sweden would make it an ideal station for A2/AD weapons such as S-300 or S-400 systems. If Russia — our any nation for that matter — were to seize the island and man defensive systems, operations in the theater would become incredibly difficult.

While the garrison on the island is less than 200 soldiers, it is a clear sign that Sweden is starting to think more seriously about defense in the region.

Stockholm’s decision to reintroduce conscription should not be overblown. It is a step toward furthering Sweden’s and the Baltic security equation, but is a small step compared to comparative Russian strength in the region.

If the Swedes want to take their security into their own hands and ensure that Moscow does not sense weakness, it will take a larger investment than a largely symbolic measure to swell the ranks.

This article originally appeared at The National Interest.

  • 100% ad free experience
  • Get our best stories sent to your inbox every day
  • Membership to private Facebook group
Show your support for continued hard hitting content.
Priced at $19.99 per year, the first 200 people to sign up will receive a free War is Boring T-Shirt.
Become a War is Boring subscriber